2.5.13 Session Initiation Protocol Core (sipcore)

NOTE: This charter is a snapshot of the 78th IETF Meeting in Maastricht, Netherlands. It may now be out-of-date.

Last Modified: 2010-04-16

Chair(s):

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>

Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s):

Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>

* The Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Directors were seated during the IETF 65.

Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>

Mailing Lists:

General Discussion: sipcore@ietf.org
To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/

Description of Working Group:

The Session Initiation Protocol Core (SIPCore) working group is
chartered to maintain and continue the development of the core SIP
specifications, currently defined as proposed standard RFCs 3261, 3262,
3263, 3264, and 3265.

The SIPCore working group will concentrate on specifications that
update or replace the core SIP specifications. In this context,
"update" means replacing or modifying protocol elements in the above
listed RFCs in ways that would affect most or all implementations of
those RFCs alone. Extensions to SIP that add new functionality that
would not be required of all implementations will be done outside of
this WG. The process and requirements for such extensions are
documented in RFC 3427bis, "Change Process for the Session Initiation
Protocol".

Throughout its work, the group will strive to maintain the basic
model and architecture defined by SIP. In particular:

1. Services and features are provided end-to-end whenever possible.

2. Reuse of existing Internet protocols and architectures and
integrating with other Internet applications is crucial.

The primary source of change requirements will be a) interoperability
problems that stem from ambiguous, or under-defined specification,
and b) requirements from other working groups in the RAI Area.

Although in general the WG will not work on extensions to SIP, it
may take on some previous work items from the SIP working group
to allow for a smooth transition. The adoption of new items requires
explicit agreement from the AD or rechartering.

Goals and Milestones:

Jul 2009  Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy to IESG (PS)
Jul 2009  INFO package framework to IESG (PS)
Aug 2009  Termination of early dialog prior to final response to IESG (PS)
Aug 2009  Location Conveyance with SIP to IESG (PS)
Oct 2009  Example security flows to IESG (Informational)
Oct 2009  Invite Transaction Handling Correction to IESG (PS)
Oct 2009  Extension for use in etags in conditional notification toIESG (PS)
Dec 2009  SIP Events throttling mechanism to IESG (PS)
Dec 2009  Mechanism for indicating support for keep-alives (PS)
Dec 2009  Error corrections and clarifications to RFC3265 to IESG (PS)
Jan 2010  Presence Scaling Requirements to IESG as Info

Internet-Drafts:

  • draft-ietf-sipcore-presence-scaling-requirements-02.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-199-02.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-keep-06.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-sec-flows-03.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-04.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-03.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-info-events-09.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc3265bis-02.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-reinvite-05.txt
  • draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-01.txt

    Request For Comments:

    RFCStatusTitle
    RFC5839 PS An Extension to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Events for Conditional Event Notification
    RFC6026 PS Correct Transaction Handling for 2xx Responses to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE Requests

    Meeting Minutes


    Slides

    Agenda and Status
    Location Conveyance
    Event Rate Control