Minutes for: IETF NFSv4 Interim Working Group Meeting Hosted in Ann Arbor, MI by University of Michigan - CITI Sept 13-15 The NFSv4 Interim meeting was help Sept 13-15, 2006 in Ann Arbor, MI to coincide with the NFSv4 interoperability testing that was taking place the same week. The meetings spanned three days to allow for discussions and testing to continue between the meeting times. The main purpose of the meetings were to review and discuss open issues related to the NFSv4.1 Internet Draft and related work. Each day, the agenda was reviewed along with blue sheets passed and note well reviewed. On the first day, Spencer started with a review of the issues raised with the ACL section of the NFSv4.1 I-D and a proposed plan on how to close on the issues and move forward with the I-D. Once that was complete, Sam Falkner continued with a detailed discussion of the ACL interpretations that had been made to that point and offered his perspective on how it would impact the current internet draft (should not impact if interpreted appropriately). Bruce Fields then discussed the interpretation of the NFSv4 ACL model and how an implementation for the Linux client and server would embody that interpretation. There were no major discussion points raised during this. Dave Noveck then presented the current state of the "parallel open" discussion and offered and alternative proposal on how to deal with the underlying requirement. On the second day, Spencer briefly covered the process the working group wanted to undertake in reviewing the pNFS objects and blocks internet drafts. These drafts are progressing along with the NFSv4.1 I-D and the consensus that no special actions needed to be taken beyond the regular calls for review. Mike Eisler then covered the details of the updates made to the NFSv4.1 I-D in the area of sessions and the motivations for the deicisions made. Dave Noveck then covered the issues in namespace parsing and presented a proposal on how to deal with the issue. On the third day, Tom Talpey reviewed the current state of the RPC/RDDP I-Ds and their last call status. He presented a proposal on how to deal with the one issue raised in relation to the effective encoding of the opaque lengths of XDR. Finally, Mike Eisler reviewed the retention proposal and offered and alternative or refactored proposal to be included in the I-D. Attendees: Robert Gordon robert.gordon@sun.com Mike Eisler email2mre-ietf@yahoo.com tigran miotdhyan tigran.miotdhyan David Noveck dnoveck@netapp.com Sergey Klyushin sergey.klyushin@hummingbird.com Benny Halevy bhalevy@panasas.com Marc Eshel eshel@almaden.ibm.com Andy Adamson andros@umich.edu Tom Talpey tmt@netapp.com Trond Myklebust trond@netapp.com Rahul Iyer iyer@netapp.com Garth Goodson goodson@netapp.com Peter Honeyman honey@citi.umich.edu Mark Mackey mark.mackay@hp.com Tom Vanderputten vanderputten_thomas@emc.com Mario Wurzl wurzl_mario@emc.com Stepehn Fridella sfridell@emc.com Lisa Week lisa.week@sun.com Sam Flkner sam.falkner@sun.com Peter Varga peter.varga@hummingbird.com Dan Trufasiu dan.trufasiu@hummingbird.com Razvan Trufasui Razuan.trufasiu@hummingbird.com Tao Zhou tao.zhou@hummingbird.com