DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
SpeechSC Meeting Minutes
IETF 64 Vancouver
November 10, 2005
Started 3:19pm
Jeff Haynie, scribe
Eric Burger open with note well and agenda bashing
Sarvi discussed status of MRCPv2 based on presentation
discussed Sarvi's proposal to Andrew Wahbe's email to add
two new timers:
014(partial-match-maxtime) and 015(no-match-maxtimeout) and
rename Recognition-timeout to "hotword-timeout" and clarify text
discussion by Dan Burnett and Dave Burke about maxspeech timer
*ACTION: we (dan, ken, myself or dave can) need to submit a
CR to VBWG for completetimeout clarification in VoiceXML
Dave asked about added a resource type to MRCP to allow sip
registration to have mrcp client to discover capabilities
of mrcp engine
Sarvi noted that we should address this in a separate document
not in MRCPv2 via RFC 3840
request to add a milestone to the charter (hint hint john) to
deal with MRCP server resource discovery, etc.
chairs agreed to move last draft to last call status
Sarvi/Dan commit to having last call draft in 2 weeks
Eric and Sarvi discussed what possible next steps
Dave agreed that infrastructure control is higher priority
that multimodal control
Ken encouraged everyone to join mrcp conformance effort,
talked about voiceprint/si features based on working group
Magnus questioned media server control, eric clarified use
of media server control (not to be confused with RTSP as
in content)
Magnus asked about playback resources for mrcp
David discussed possible work around playback resources, but
looking at needs in a broader detail to determine what needs
to be done
Sarvi clarified the capability of playback resource using
simple synth resource, so we have a good amount of detail
already built
David didn't want to design this now since not everything
is covered like time control you have in RTSP
Magnus wants to sit down and clarify what would need to be
done, possibly work outside of group
Eric asked about DMCP submission
David asked if anyone would champion DMCP, in the absence
of input will not do anything. David/Eric are willing to help
agenda done, open mic
Dan asked about procedural clarification
"snotty answer" from Eric - just because we're done doesn't
mean we're done, real answer from Jon Peterson
Jon: i have to read it (give feedback), then IESG (give
feedback), then RFC editor (editorial review comments)
Jon: process could take a couple of months to a couple of years
David thanked everyone for hard work
Adjourned at 4:03pm (second shortest meeting)
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
|