Last Modified: 2003-05-21
Done | Submit core object specification as Internet-Draft. | |
Done | Submit first Internet-Draft of Calendar Interoperability Protocol. | |
Done | Submit second draft of core object specification as Internet-Draft. | |
Done | Submit revised Internet-Draft of Calendar Interoperability Protocol. | |
Done | Submit core object specification to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard. | |
Done | Submit Calendar Interoperability Protocol to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Draft. | |
Done | Submit Internet-Draft (informational) on Guide to Implementors using Calendaring Protocols | |
Feb 01 | Hold second CalConnect Interoperability Testing on iCalendar, iMIP and iTIP | |
Mar 01 | Submit Internet-Draft on Calendar Access Protocol to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard. | |
Jul 01 | Request last call on Guide to Internet Calendaring | |
Jul 01 | Submit Internet-Draft on Guide to Internet Calendaring for consideration as a Proposed Standard | |
Jul 01 | Submit revisions for Internet-Draft for iCalendar, iMIP and iTIP | |
Jul 01 | Submit revisions for Internet-Draft for Calendar Access Protocol | |
Jan 02 | Evaluate readiness for interoperability testing of Calendar Access Protocol |
Adjourn.Minutes reported by Bob Mahoney. There were no slides. -- There were no additions to the agenda. We have an obvious lack of clarity regarding some of the 2445 recurrence grammar. The original text is being interpreted in conflicting ways, and the chairs have asked the authors of the original document to clarify the intended approach. The authors have in most cases moved on to other efforts, and we appreciate their time and look forward to some clarification. The chairs will be resolving these issues SHORTLY following this input, and any resulting discussions on the list. We need to get a basic document out, so that we can have firm footing from which we can consider useful extensions and other next steps. Some attendees indicated that they have a list of suggested editorial corrections in process, which will be sent to the list when complete. To help get a basic document out soon, an effort will be made to identify any current functionality which can be usefully handled as extensions. We've begun to see new implementation efforts based on the existing drafts, although this has pointed out some ambiguity from the earlier work. Our Milestones are well out of date. The chairs will have them updated soon. (August 1 target) Attendance was light, leading to a discussion of the need for physical meetings, given the challenges seen by many WG participants in attending. The chairs will consider this issue in the future, and attempt to reserve physical meetings for the most useful opportunitie |