Last Modified: 2003-02-25
Distributed network management is widely recognized as a requirement for dealing with today's growing internets. A manager application is a good candidate for distribution if it requires minimal user interaction, it would potentially consume a significant amount of network resources due to frequent polling or large data retrieval, or it requires close association with the device(s) being managed.
The working group will limit its work to distributed network management applications where the main communication mechanism for monitoring and control is SNMP. Future work (and other working groups) may be chartered to investigate other distribution techniques such as CORBA or HTTP. The objects defined by the working group will be consistent with the SNMP architecture defined in RFC 2571. The working group will especially keep security considerations in mind when defining the interface to distributed management.
The working group will complete these tasks:
Define a Scheduling MIB
Define a Script MIB
Define a Remote Operations MIB
Define an Expression and Event MIB to support Threshold Monitoring
Define a Notification Log MIB
Define an Alarm MIB
The working group will consider existing definitions, including:
o the RMON working group's work in this area
o the Application MIB (RFC 2564), SysAppl MIB (RFC 2287) and related standards.
The work on the Alarm MIB will take into consideration existing standards and practices, such as ITU-T X.733. Whether any mappings to these other standards appear in the Alarm MIB or in separate documents will be decided by the WG. The WG will actively seek participation from ITU participants to make ensure that the ITU work is correctly understood.
It is recognized that the scope of this working group is narrow relative to the potential in the area of distributed network management. This is intentional in order to increase the likelihood of producing useful, quality specifications in a timely manner. However, we will keep in mind and account for potential related or future work when developing the framework including:
o Event and alarm logging and distribution
o Historical data collection/summarization
o Topology discovery
Done | Post Internet-Draft for Threshold Monitoring MIB. | |
Done | Meet at the Montreal IETF meeting to discuss charter and review the Threshold Monitoring MIB Internet-Draft. | |
Done | Post Internet-Draft for Framework document. | |
Done | Post Internet-Draft for Script MIB. | |
Done | Submit final version of Threshold Monitor MIB Internet-Draft for consideration as a Proposed Standard. Submit updated versions of Internet-Drafts for Script MIB. | |
Done | Meet at the IETF meeting to discuss Internet-Drafts and issues that come up on the mailing list. | |
Done | Submit final versions of Internet-Drafts for Script MIB and Schedule MIB document for consideration as Proposed Standards. | |
Done | Agree on charter revisions for future work. | |
Done | Submit final versions of Internet-Drafts for Expression, Event and Notification MIB documents for consideration as Proposed Standards. | |
Done | Submit final version of Internet-Draft for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations Using SMIv2 | |
Done | Meeting in Oslo to discuss implementation and deployment experience with Schedule and Script mibs, identify any updates needed to these documents. | |
Done | WG agreement on direction regarding mappings to / from other alarm frameworks | |
Done | Submit updated Script and Schedule MIBs for consideration as Draft Standard (or recycle at Proposed). | |
Done | Submit updated draft of Alarm MIB for IETF meeting | |
Done | decision on question of whether recycle the Log MIB. | |
Done | Submit updated draft of Alarm MIB for IETF meeting. | |
Done | call for implementation experience and updates to the remote operations MIB. | |
Done | call for implementation experience and updates to the Event and Expression MIBs. | |
Done | WG last call on Alarm Management MIB. | |
Done | Alarm Management MIB delivered to IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard. |
RFC | Status | Title |
---|---|---|
RFC2591 | PS | Definitions of Managed Objects for Scheduling Management Operations |
RFC2592 | PS | Definitions of Managed Objects for the Delegation of Management Scripts |
RFC2925 | PS | Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations |
RFC2982 | PS | Distributed Management Expression MIB |
RFC2981 | PS | Event MIB |
RFC3014 | PS | Notification Log MIB |
RFC3165 | PS | Definitions of Managed Objects for the Delegation of Management Scripts |
RFC3231 | PS | Definitions of Managed Objects for Scheduling Management Operations |
Disman WG Minutes from the 56th IETF - reported by Ramanathan Kavasseri (ramk@cisco.com) 1. Sharon Chisholm tasked with drafting a "Thank You" message to the ITU-T Liaison, and sending the draft to the DISMAN wg. 2. Sharon will look for any cases where we missed carrying over range constraints into the Alarm MIB docs... 3. Need to wordsmith the description of AlarmResourceID on the mailing list 4. Need to add language describing the persistence of the alarm model table. Also need to determine whether the lang reg persistence is in terms of MUST. That was believed to be the consensus in the past - need to reverify the consensus on the mailing list. 5. Timeframe for finishing Alarm MIB edits (and discussion) - end of March 2003. Updated I-D to appear in April. 6. Hing-Kam Lam needs to look at latest version of ID nits doc, the update to the RFC authors guidelines - for the ARC MIB update, as well as the latest guidelines for MIB reviewers. 7. Kam to make known edits to ARC from above tasks, and send it to Bert and internet-drafts... 8. For Script MIB and Schedule MIB - Randy to look at a questionnaire for implementation requests on these MIBs. 9. Remops MIB - if anyone is interested in assiting with edits, to contact RP on the disman mailing list. 10. Octet String in Remops MIB for payload - has a constraint related to ipv4 - computes pkt size - ipv4 hdr size. Need description clarification on what the object should do (return an error or silently truncate payload size) when transport type is ipv6 - Randy Presuhn suggested silently truncating. Need further discussion on the mailing list. This action item is assigned to Randy Presunhn. 10. Ram Kavasseri to initiate thread on taking Expression MIB to historic status 11. Bert to check whether a doc recommending historic status for Expr MIB is reqd. 12. Need interoperability results (for event and notif-log mibs) summary on wg mailing list. Ram Kavasseri to drive the interoperability test effort. Results need to be posted to the wg by May. 13. NetSNMP implements the EVENT-MIB - this MIB is the target of internal polling for NetSNMP apps. Wes Hardaker to provide pointers on how to set up a copy of NetSNMP running the EVENT-MIB for interoperability testing. 14. Sharon to check and report back on implementations of log MIB at Nortel. 15. Updates for Expr, Event, Notif-Log MIB expected by April 1st. Editor needs to look at latest version of ID nits doc, the update to the RFC authors guidelines - for the ARC MIB update, as well as the latest guidelines for MIB reviewers. 16. Ram to repost implementation requests for the event, expression and notif-log mibs on the disman wg. |