IPFIX WG meeting at IETF 78, 1300 on 29 July 2010 Minutes by Nevil Brownlee, with thanks to scribe Chris Inacio IPFIX WG status: Nevil Brownlee reported that errata 2052-2059 should say 'unsigned32,' rather than 'unsigned64;' he will liase with RFC-Editor and Dan Romascanu to get that corrected. Two IPFIX RFCs (Mediators Problem Statement and SCTP per-stream) have been approved by IESG and are in th4e RFC EDitor Queue. Current WG Documents: Gerhard Muenz presented the Configureation Data Model, and made it clear that their have been significant changes. In particular, the handling of Selection Processes (SPs) has been simplified. A new version (-07) of the draft will be published soon, then we will run another WG Last Call. Brian Trammell spoke briefly to the Anonomysation draft; this is waiting for Nevil to do it's Shepherd writeup. Haruhiko Nishida reported on the Mediators Framework draft. The -06 version was published after an editing session at the Anaheim IETF, -07 and -08 incorporate further improvements. The draft now has WG consensus; Juergen will do it's Shepherd writeup. Salvatore D'Antonio presented the Flow Selection Techniques draft, making it clear that the draft addresses only flow-state-dependent sampling. Benoit Claise pointed out that flow selection will need to be considered in a 'Mediation Protocol' draft (specifying a protocol to configure IPFIX Mediators). The draft editors will publish the next revision soon, then it will be ready for WG Last Call. Benoit presented the Export of Structured Data draft, including comments from four WG reviewers. After comsiderable discussion, the meeting agreed that List semantics need to well-defined and orthogonal to the underlying data structures. After its next revision, the draft will be ready for WG Last Call. Benoit led a discuussion (no slides) of version -01 of the PSAMP MIB. Help from the MIB Doctors is needed to model the MIB's unsigned64 and float64 objects (Dan asked for this to be discussed offline, and suggested we should avoid creating a new Textual Convention). Apart from that, the draft needs work on its Security Considerations, and a set of normative references to the other IPFIX RFCs. When the next version is published we will start its WG Last Call. New (non-WG) Drafts: Brian Trammell presented 'Exporting Aggregated Flow Data using IPFIX.' This is very much a preliminary version, pointing out the issues raised by aggregated flows; it only applies to temporal aggregation, not to spatial aggregation. There was considerable discussion, and comment about the interplay between aggregation and anonymisation. Brian went on to present 'A Lightweight Textual Format for IPFIX.' This is intended as a non-XML represetation of IPFIX Information Elements for use in simple IPFIX Applications. Benoit suggested it might be useful for "IPFIX Doctors" (cf MIB Doctors), or for people who don't need to know IPFIX's IANA details. This was an initial presentation, if you are interested please send comments to the IPFIX list. Shingo Kashima presented 'Information Elements for Link Layer Measurement.' Dan suggested that existing FrameType Textual Conventions could be suitable for describing a link type, and commented that this should use a 16-bit value. Paul Aitken suggested that the draft authors should check the IPFIX IEs 1-127, so that this draft could maintain compatibility with NetFlow v9. AGain, comments on the IPFIX list are welcome. The meeting reviewed the IPFIX Milestones, Nevil will ask the Secretariat to change them. -----------------