l3vpn-1----Page:8
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19 

Open Issues
The VRF_ID described in current draft led to state storage in ASBRs even if CAC not needed
Solution: instead of VRF_ID, use a new VPNv4 PHOP type so that Resv can be forwarded directly from egress PE to ingress PE
Yakov Rekhter has suggested use of VPNv4 session type rather than VPN_Label object
Since labels and VPNv4 addresses map 1:1, seems like a small change
Kumaki et al requested support for RSVP-TE from CEs
We think this is feasible, not yet done in draft

PPT Version