Open Issues The VRF_ID described in current draft led to state storage in ASBRs even if CAC not needed Solution: instead of VRF_ID, use a new VPNv4 PHOP type so that Resv can be forwarded directly from egress PE to ingress PE Yakov Rekhter has suggested use of VPNv4 session type rather than VPN_Label object Since labels and VPNv4 addresses map 1:1, seems like a small change Kumaki et al requested support for RSVP-TE from CEs We think this is feasible, not yet done in draft |