2.4.1 ADSL MIB (adslmib)

NOTE: This charter is a snapshot of the 44th IETF Meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It may now be out-of-date. Last Modified: 11-Feb-99

Chair(s):

Michael Sneed <mike.sneed@pulse.com>
David Allan <dallan@nortel.ca>

Operations and Management Area Director(s):

Harald Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>
Bert Wijnen <wijnen@vnet.ibm.com>

Operations and Management Area Advisor:

Bert Wijnen <wijnen@vnet.ibm.com>

Technical Advisor(s):

Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com>

Editor(s):

Greg Bathrick <bathricg@agcs.com>

Mailing Lists:

General Discussion:adsl@xlist.agcs.com
To Subscribe: mgr@xlist.agcs.com
In Body: subscribe/unsubscribe adsl
Archive: www.agcs.com/adsl/

Description of Working Group:

The ADSL Working Group is chartered to define a set of managed objects to be used for management of Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line services as defined by ANSI T1.413. The initial effort will define those management objects common to all ADSL lines regardless of line-code. The devices to be managed using these managed objects will include:

1) Access provider equipment containing ATU-C modems, such as DSLAMs, and

2) Subscriber equipment containing ATU-R modems such as routers, NIC cards, and standalone modem devices.

The MIBs defined by this group will be generated using SMIv2, will be consistent with the SNMP management framework, and will describe the relationship of the objects defined to existing MIBs such as those described by RFC2233, and RFC1695. The working group will consider the input of the ADSL forum, and will utilize the existing ADSL Forum line MIB as a starting point for its work when that document is submitted as an Internet Draft. The working group plans on producing a single standards track MIB suitable for use in both access provider and subscriber equipment.

Goals and Milestones:

Jul 98

  

Submit Internet-Draft to cover subscriber equipment

Aug 98

  

Meet at Chicago IETF to review Internet-Drafts

Nov 98

  

Submit Internet-Draft to IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard.

Internet-Drafts:

No Request For Comments

Current Meeting Report

None received.

Slides

None received.