IPv6 Operations (v6ops)


In addition to this official charter maintained by the IETF Secretariat, there is additional information about this working group on the Web at:

       Additional V6OPS Web Page

Last Modified: 2008-04-22

Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/v6ops

Chair(s):

  • Fred Baker <fred.baker@cisco.com>

  • Kurt Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>

    Operations and Management Area Director(s):

  • Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>
  • Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>

    Operations and Management Area Advisor:

  • Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>

    Mailing Lists:

    General Discussion: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
    To Subscribe: majordomo@ops.ietf.org
    In Body: subscribe v6ops
    Archive: http://ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/

    Description of Working Group:

    The global deployment of IPv6 is underway, creating an IPv4/IPv6
    Internet consisting of IPv4-only, IPv6-only and IPv4/IPv6 networks and
    nodes. This deployment must be properly handled to avoid the division
    of the Internet into separate IPv4 and IPv6 networks while ensuring
    addressing and connectivity for all IPv4 and IPv6 nodes.

    The IPv6 Operations Working Group (v6ops) develops guidelines for the
    operation of a shared IPv4/IPv6 Internet and provides operational
    guidance on how to deploy IPv6 into existing IPv4-only networks,
    as well as into new network installations.

    The main focus of the v6ops WG is to look at the immediate
    deployment issues; more advanced stages of deployment and transition
    are a lower priority.

    The goals of the v6ops working group are:

    1. Solicit input from network operators and users to identify
    operational issues with the IPv4/IPv6 Internet, and
    determine solutions or workarounds to those issues. These issues
    will be documented in Informational or BCP RFCs, or in
    Internet-Drafts.

    This work should primarily be conducted by those areas and WGs
    which are responsible and best fit to analyze these problems, but
    v6ops may also cooperate in focusing such work.

    2. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify potential security
    risks in the operation of shared IPv4/IPv6 networks, and document
    operational practices to eliminate or mitigate those risks.

    This work will be done in cooperation with the Security area and
    other relevant areas or working groups.

    3. As a particular instance of (1) and (2), provide feedback to
    the IPv6 WG regarding portions of the IPv6 specifications that
    cause, or are likely to cause, operational or security concerns,
    and work with the IPv6 WG to resolve those concerns. This feedback
    will be published in Internet-Drafts or RFCs.

    4. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs that identify and analyze
    solutions
    for deploying IPv6 within common network environments, such as
    ISP Networks, Enterprise Networks, Unmanaged Networks (Home/Small
    Office), and Cellular Networks.

    These documents should serve as useful guides to network
    operators and users on possible ways how to deploy IPv6 within their
    existing IPv4 networks, as well as in new network installations.

    These documents should not be normative guides for IPv6 deployment,
    and the primary intent is not capture the needs for new solutions,
    but rather describe which approaches work and which do not.

    IPv6 operational and deployment issues with specific protocols or
    technologies (such as Applications, Transport Protocols, Routing
    Protocols, DNS or Sub-IP Protocols) are the primary responsibility of
    the groups or areas responsible for those protocols or technologies.
    However, the v6ops WG may provide input to those areas/groups, as
    needed, and cooperate with those areas/groups in reviewing solutions
    to IPv6 operational and deployment problems.

    Future work items within this scope will be adopted by the WG only if
    there is a substantial expression of interest from the community and
    if the work clearly does not fit elsewhere in the IETF.

    There must be a continuous expression of interest for the WG to work
    on a particular work item. If there is no longer sufficient interest
    in the WG in a work item, the item may be removed from the list of WG
    items.

    Specifying any protocols or transition mechanisms is out of scope of
    the WG.

    Goals and Milestones:

    Done  Publish Cellular Deployment Scenarios as a WG I-D
    Done  Publish Unmanaged Network Deployment Scenarios as a WG I-D
    Done  Publish Survey of IPv4 Addresses in IETF Standards as WG I-D
    Done  Publish Cellular Deployment Solutions as a WG I-D
    Done  Publish Unmanaged Network Deployment Solutions as a WG I-D
    Done  Submit Cellular Deployment Scenarios to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Unmanaged Network Deployment Scenarios to IESG for Info
    Done  Publish Enterprise Deployment Scenarios as a WG I-D
    Done  Submit Survey of IPv4 Addresses in IETF Standards to IESG for Info
    Done  Publish ISP Deployment & Solutions as a WG I-D
    Done  Submit Cellular Deployment Solutions to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Transition Mechanisms to IESG for PS
    Done  Submit IPv6 Neighbor Discovery On-Link Assumption to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Dual Stack IPv6 on by Default to IESG for Informational
    Done  Submit Unmanaged Network Deployment Solutions to IESG for BCP
    Done  Submit ISP Deployment Scenarios & Solutions to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Application Aspects of IPv6 Transition to IESG for Informational
    Done  Submit 6to4 Security Analysis to IESG for Informational
    Done  Submit Enterprise Deployment Scenarios to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Renumbering Procedures to IESG for Info
    Done  Adopt IPv6 Network Architecture Protection as WG item
    Done  Adopt document describing how to use IPsec with draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2 as WG item
    Done  Adopt IPv6 Security Overview as WG item
    Done  Ensure draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault keeps going forward for RFC publication
    Done  Submit IPv6 deployment using VLANs to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit document describing issues with NAT-PT to IESG for Info
    Done  Adopt IPv6 deployment using VLANs to IESG for Info
    Done  Adopt ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access Networks as WG item
    Done  Submit document on IPsec w/ draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2 to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit IPv6 Network Architecture Protection to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit Enterprise Deployment Analysis to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit IPv6 Security Overview to IESG for Info
    Done  Submit ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access Networks to IESG for Info

    Internet-Drafts:

    IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations (81875 bytes)
    Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service (78694 bytes)
    IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition: Requirements for solutions (39027 bytes)
    IPv6 RA-Guard (16384 bytes)
    Security Concerns With Tunneling (44450 bytes)

    Request For Comments:

    Transition Scenarios for 3GPP Networks (RFC 3574) (23359 bytes)
    Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition Scenarios (RFC 3750) (48153 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Sub-IP Area Standards (RFC 3793) (11624 bytes)
    Introduction to the Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Standards (RFC 3789) (22842 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Internet Area Standards (RFC 3790) (102694 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Routing Area Standards (RFC 3791) (27567 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Security Area Standards (RFC 3792) (46398 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Transport Area Standards (RFC 3794) (60001 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Application Area Standards (RFC 3795) (92584 bytes)
    Survey of IPv4 Addresses in Currently Deployed IETF Operations & Management Area Standards (RFC 3796) (78400 bytes)
    Evaluation of Transition Mechanisms for Unmanaged Networks (RFC 3904) (46844 bytes)
    Security Considerations for 6to4 (RFC 3964) (83360 bytes)
    Application Aspects of IPv6 Transition (RFC 4038) (69727 bytes)
    Scenarios and Analysis for Introducing IPv6 into ISP Networks (RFC 4029) (64388 bytes)
    IPv6 Enterprise Network Scenarios (RFC 4057) (33454 bytes)
    Procedures for Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag Day (RFC 4192) (52110 bytes) updates RFC 2072
    Analysis on IPv6 Transition in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Networks (RFC 4215) (52903 bytes)
    Basic Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Hosts and Routers (RFC 4213) (58575 bytes) obsoletes RFC 2893
    Use of VLANs for IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Enterprise Networks (RFC 4554) (23355 bytes)
    ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access Networks (RFC 4779) (188511 bytes)
    IPv6 Enterprise Network Analysis - IP Layer 3 Focus (RFC 4852) (76199 bytes)
    Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls (RFC 4890) (83479 bytes)
    Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnels (RFC 4891) (46635 bytes)
    Local Network Protection for IPv6 (RFC 4864) (95448 bytes)
    Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic Status (RFC 4966) (60284 bytes) obsoletes RFC 2766
    IPv6 Neighbor Discovery On-Link Assumption Considered Harmful (RFC 4943) (16719 bytes)
    IPv6 Transition/Co-existence Security Considerations (RFC 4942) (102878 bytes)
    IPv6 Implications for Network Scanning (RFC 5157) (29054 bytes)
    Special-Use IPv6 Addresses (RFC 5156) (11931 bytes)
    IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks (RFC 5181) (36671 bytes)
    Problem Statement for Default Address Selection in Multi-Prefix Environments: Operational Issues (RFC 5220) (33661 bytes)
    Requirements for Address Selection Mechanisms (RFC 5221) (13732 bytes)

    IETF Secretariat - Please send questions, comments, and/or suggestions to ietf-web@ietf.org.

    Return to working group directory.

    Return to IETF home page.